Wednesday, March 11, 2015

The "Original" Ten Commandments


 Parshat Vayakhel-Pekudei


Instead of spending another week talking about the tabernacle construction, the topic of this weeks parshah.  I want to go back and discuss some of the hypothesis that explain a confusing set of verses in Exodus 34.  In the process we'll introduce several different authors to explain the odd chronology of events that we looked at last week.

J, E and P

I've briefly mentioned in the past, but I'll state clearly now, the ideas behind the Documentary Hypothesis (or DH).  DH attempts to explain some of the odd inconsistencies of the Torah, both from internal contradictions like we saw last week with the underwear, or with the story of Joseph in the pit, or the use of the names of God and other things like the doublet stories in Genesis.  The explanation is that the conflicting or duplicate stories were originally part of multiple documents, which were later combined.  The specific conventional theory is that J and E represent the two oldest documents, J from the southern kingdom of Judah, and E from the northern kingdom of Israel. These were then redacted into a JE document.  A later document P, so named because of an obsession with priestly ideas, was later redacted with JE into the document that comprises the first four books of the Torah.  (The fourth author D is confined to Deuteronomy, and we'll get to that later.)  A lesser form of DH, would attribute these contradictory elements to multiple traditions that may not have actually been written down.  This is similar to the ideas put forth by Cassuto.  Either one, the full DH, or one of the lesser forms like the supplement hypothesis, is sufficient for this exercise.

In this section of the Torah, from the beginning of the encampment at Sinai/Horeb, to the construction of the tabernacle there are three different authors contributing.  The text surrouding Sinai itself is a mishmash of J and E and has some contentious splitting, so we'll ignore it for now.  We're more interested in the overall story.  We'll start with one version of the story, the one attributed to E.  It begins at Exod 20:18, with the description of the mountain and continues all the way through the legal Hammurabi-like laws.  It continues with the first half of Exod 24 where Moshe (Moses) consecrates the people, and Moshe, Aharon (Aaron) and 70 other people all go up to have a meal with God (Exod 24:11).  After which, Moshe goes alone up the mountain, and there's a break in the E story at Exod 24:15.  We rejoin the story in Exod. 32 and 33 which is the golden calf episode discussed last week and the subsequent aftermath with God revealing himself to Moses.  After that, the E story is completely done.

The J story is shorter.  There are some parts of Exod 19 with the Sinai story.  It picks up at Exod 25 with Moshe warning the people not to try to approach the mountain.  Note that this occurs after Moshe and seventy elders all went up the mountain and had a meal.  It then jumps to Exod 34 with God instructing Moshe to make two tablets.  (Note that in J there is no golden calf, or breaking of the first tablets, so there's some redaction comments to smooth the transition.)  In Exod. 34 God reveals himself again to Moshe, and gives him the tablets with the ten commandments, a different set of commandments, that are specifically referred to as the ten commandments in Exod 34:28.  This is the entirety of the J story.

The P story is probably not a standalone story, but was likely a supplement to the JE story (or perhaps just he E story.) [1].  It includes the commandments about the tabernacle, and the story about Moshe's wearing a mask because his face became disfigured (Exod 34:29-35), and the description of the Sabbath in Exod 35.

The 10 commandments of J (and E)

The 10 commandments in J are written in Exod 34:14-26.  They are the following:

  1. Do not worship any other God (Exod 34:14-16)
  2. Do not make molten images (Exod 34:17)
  3. Observe the festival of Pesach (Passover) (Exod 34:18) [2]
  4. Consecrate every firstborn (Exod 34:19-20)
  5. Observe the Sabbath (Exod 34:20)
  6. Observe Sukkot (Exod 34:22)
  7. Appear before God three times a year (Exod 34:23-24)
  8. Do not offer blood of sacrifice on leavened bread (Exod 34:25)
  9. Bring first fruits to God (Exod 34:26a)
  10. Do not cook a kid in its mother's milk (Exod 34:26b) [3]
These differ significantly from the commandments in Exod 20, the ten commandments we are more familiar with.  Only the first two, and the commandments to observe the Sabbath are the same between them.  They represent a possibly older set of commandments concerned predominantly with sacrificial and laws of proper worship.  Some of these laws are repetitive in the laws of the E account written a few chapters earlier.  In fact, E has a section, amidst it's many laws, which has a bunch of very similar laws to those in J written in Exod 23, which has:
  • Observe the Sabbath (Exod 23:12)
  • Do not mention other gods (Exod 23:13)
  • Keep the three festivals (Exod 23:14-16)
  • Appear before God three times (Exod 23:17)
  • Do not offer blood sacrifices on leavened bread (Exod 23:18)
  • Bring first fruits to God (Exod 23:19a)
  • Do not cook a kid in its mother's milk (Exod 23:19b)
Some of the words also appear in exactly the same language, especially the last 3.  It is clear that these laws were cultic laws that were central to both forms of the text.  It remains to people who wish to argue that everything is written by a single author to explain why these commandments need to be repeated in exactly the same language.

Where did the 10 commandments we know come from?

There is one remaining question.  To which tradition do the commandments in Exod 20, the ones commonly referred to as the ten commandments come from?  The answer is, probably to none of them.  It is not clear where these commandments came from.  They also appear, in almost similar form in Deuteronomy.  One theory could be that these belong to P, written after D, and inserted into the text here with some minor changes (namely relating Shabbat to the creation rather than the exodus).  Another option is that it's an older and separate document that was inserted into the text here by a later redactor (although probably included by the author of Deuteronomy).  I don't have a solid answer here, there are many acceptable options.

However, without a doubt it can be argued that the commandments listed above, the ones in Exod 34 and Exod 23, are both earlier versions of the divine commandments given by God to Moshe, and that these represent an earlier tradition of what was in the divine covenant.
Looking Ahead

With this week we've finished the second book of the Torah, the book of Shmot (Exodus). The next book represents the "doldrums" of the Torah the book of Vayikra (Leviticus). It is full with detailed descriptions of sacrifices and all sorts of things concerning how the tabernacle, and later the temple, should be run. The first two weeks will focus on these topics. After that we'll have two weeks devoted to Pesach (Passover). But after that, for the rest of the book, I may use some liberal interpretations of what topic to discuss. It should be interesting.


1. For more on the dependence of P on E, see F. M. Cross "Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic. ^

2. If this law of Pesach is familiar, that's because we saw it way back when talking about Sukkot. ^

3. Just like with the ten commandments in Exod. 20, where the Jewish and Christian disagree on how to divide the ten commandments, it's possible to split these up in different ways. ^

13 comments:

  1. Just checking in letting you know your work is appreciated. Interesting discussion about multiple versions of 10 commandments. I used to believe the Torah laws, and rituals were dictated by God. But objective analysis, critical thinking, science and studying ancient near east laws and rituals shattered my beliefs. It now seems obvious the Torah is a product of ancient near east culture and not divine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your blog! I had been eagerly anticipating this entry, and you did a great job outlining basic documentary hypothesis and a beginner discussion on the various Decalogues. Can we delve deeper and try and research and answer the following questions :

    1. Why were these 10 (exodus 34) the foundation of ancient Judaism ?

    2. Why were these replaced (or added to) by later authors?

    3. Why did the later Decalogues gain popularity?

    4. Why is this Decalogue virtually unrecognized as significant by traditional orthodox scholars?

    Perhaps Cocker can add more questions and answers to enrich our torah study!!

    All the best!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can answer some of these.

      1) I think it's pretty clear why some of these are foundational commandments for Judaism. The aniconic nature of worship (no idols) is definitely one of the things that distinguishes worship of the Jewish God, compared to worship of other Gods. It's not hard to see why stuff like Sabbath and holidays are up there. The consecration of the firstborn is also another very important commandment for early Judaism, since it's a rejection of the practice to actually sacrifice the firstborn. Early Judaism made a big deal about rejecting human sacrifice (not because it's not effective, but because God just preferred something different). The commandments about blood sacrifices on leavened bread, and not boiling kids in mother's milk are indeed very strange. There has been a lot written on the last one, and maybe at some point I can dig up enough references to write on it in more detail.

      2-3) The 10 commandments in Exodus 20 are a reasonable replacement for these more cultic commandments for a more advanced society, one with a centralized government. That's probably why they got first billing in the final form of the Torah. It's not clear that they are actually written later. For all we know they could predate the cultic 10 commandments in Exod. 34.

      4) Modern scholars don't recognize these as the 10 commandments because the Talmud doesn't. Orthodox Jewish exegesis is dependent on Talmudic interpretation for things like this, as it claims a consistent interpretation of the text from the time it was written, and is thus authoritative.

      Delete
  3. As if this is not confusing enough see Exodus 34:27 - were the list in Exodus 34 become the covenant. That list differs from the '10 commandments '- and was not that meant to be the covenant ?
    So what was the contract with God anyway ?

    Then see Exodus 34:1 God says he will inscribe the second pair of tablets. But in Exodus 34:27 he tells Moshe to write them. So God breaks his word. Then in Exodus 34:28 Moshe writes the pact.
    Then see Deut 10:4 where it says God actually inscribes the two new tablets, and moreover with the same words as the first tablets. LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I was going to go into the "who wrote the commandments" question, which is another support for multiple authors here, but I think I just forgot to include it.

      Delete
  4. @Cocker; it sounds like for you the lesson is simple : it wasn't written by a God or Moses but by various authors, period. That is abundantly clear from the entire pentatuch, and especially here in the decalogue discussions.

    @Kefira: I'd love to hear about it. I'm glad we share a passion and curiosity for bible scholarship. I suspect we also share a similar background as well.

    An (orthoprax) friend of mine opines that the ritual decalogue was less marketable than the ethical commandments to the 'modern' babelonian exilic and post-exilic Jews. Adopting the ethical decalogue may have been one of the the first movement towards 'Reformed Judaism '.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As far as Leviticus goes, there are many hidden gems in it especially:
    כָּל־חֵ֗רֶם אֲשֶׁ֧ר יָחֳרַ֛ם מִן־הָאָדָ֖ם לֹ֣א יִפָּדֶ֑ה מֹ֖ות יוּמָֽת׃

    And:


    אַךְ־כָּל־חֵ֡רֶם אֲשֶׁ֣ר יַֽחֲרִם֩ אִ֨ישׁ לַֽיהוָ֜ה מִכָּל־אֲשֶׁר־ל֗וֹ מֵֽאָדָ֤ם וּבְהֵמָה֙ וּמִשְּׂדֵ֣ה אֲחֻזָּת֔וֹ לֹ֥א יִמָּכֵ֖ר וְלֹ֣א יִגָּאֵ֑ל כָּל־חֵ֕רֶם קֹֽדֶשׁ־קָֽדָשִׁ֥ים ה֖וּא לַֽיהוָֽה׃

    Which traditional (orthodox) biblical scholars must twist and misread to avoid acknowledging the ancient Hebrew tradition of human sacrifice!


    ReplyDelete
  6. Scratch that Kefira, Cocker already covered it here:
    http://altercockerjewishatheist.blogspot.com/2014/01/human-sacrifice-in-bible.html?m=1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was about to point you to just that, and what he references here:

      http://www.daatemet.org.il/articles/article.cfm?article_id=76&lang=en

      I was thinking of that topic for the last week of Vayikra, but seeing that it's already done, I might choose something else.

      Delete
  7. Human Sacrifice as part of original Israelite practice - a can of worms. Are there hidden secrets in the Tenach. See II Samuel 21, And there was a famine in the land...let seven males be impaled/hung before (for ? to ?) Yahweh...at the beginning of the barley harvest. Besides the morality of the situation, Yahweh must be pleased as it rains. And that magic number 7 yet again. This is Yahweh, Oy vey to all of us.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Also see http://altercockerjewishatheist.blogspot.com/2013/11/passover-origins-short-note-on-human.html There is some more discussion regarding Human Sacrifice in the Torah.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks Cocker, it's abundantly clear from these and other events in tanach, including Yiftach (Jephetah) that human sacrifice was alive (pun) and we'll in biblical Judaism or at least in what are proported to be biblical times.

    Obviously, later yahwists attempted a cover-up of these and other shortcomings, and did a good enough job slipping by, until a small group of curious, technology savvy, former yeshiva boys found the truth!

    Speaking of slipping by, I had learned and TAUGHT megillat Esther and masechet Megilla for years and only recently have begun to scratch the surface of the truth and myth behind that fascinating story, the various versions of Esther and the canonization and rejection of the book of Esther. It's as though I needed to leave orthodoxy to finally begin to truly learn our torah and jewish history. Irony?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ M Rose When one is enveloped by a black bag it is difficult to have vision beyond it. This is so for many reasons. One of my enlightening heroes is Spinoza.

      Delete